Ender Nunez-Avile v. Attorney General United States of America
| ENDER JESUS NUNEZ-AVILE |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-3127 |
| August 21, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. [26-3127] (TS) [Entered: 09/22/2026 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION filed by Petitioner Ender Jesus Nunez-Avile for Appointment of Counsel. Certificate of Service dated 09/04/2026. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 09/16/2026 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 10 Copy of the Supplement to Petitioners Motion to Stay Removal. Certificate of Service dated 09/03/2026 by ECF.--[Edited 09/14/2026 by SB] (JD) [Entered: 09/09/2026 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 9 Supplement to Petitioners Motion to Stay Removal.--[Edited 09/14/2026 by SB] (JK) [Entered: 09/08/2026 05:35 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: Response filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America to motion to stay removal. Certificate of Service dated 08/31/2026. [26-3127] (AN) [Entered: 08/31/2026 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Anthony J. Nardi on behalf of Respondent(s) Todd Blanche, U.S. Attorney General. [26-3127] (AN) [Entered: 08/21/2026 09:50 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the administrative record. (SB) [Entered: 08/21/2026 08:50 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Ender Jesus Nunez-Avile. The Court may reconsider in forma pauperis status or request additional information at any time during the course of these proceedings. (SB) [Entered: 08/21/2026 08:50 AM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION filed by Petitioner Ender Jesus Nunez-Avile to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 08/14/2026. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 08/21/2026 08:49 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal. (SB) [Entered: 08/21/2026 08:44 AM]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Ender Jesus Nunez-Avile to Stay Removal. Response due on 08/31/2026. Certificate of Service dated 08/14/2026. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 08/21/2026 08:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Ender Jesus Nunez-Avile. Certificate of Service dated 08/14/2026. Service made by US mail. Petition filed nonelectronically. (SB) [Entered: 08/21/2026 08:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ender Nunez-Avile v. Attorney General United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ENDER JESUS NUNEZ-AVILE | |
| Represented By: | Ender Jesus Nunez-Avile |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Anthony Nardi Esq. |
| Represented By: | Todd Blanche Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
