USA v. City of Newark, et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| CITY OF NEWARK, CITY OF JERSEY CITY, CITY OF PATERSON, CITY OF HOBOKEN, NEWARK CITY COUNCIL, JERSEY CITY COUNCIL, PATERSON CITY COUNCIL, HOBOKEN CITY COUNCIL, C. LAWRENCE CRUMP, Newark City Council President, in his official capacity, JOYCE E. WATTERMAN, Jersey City Council President, in her official capacity, ALEX MENDEZ, Paterson City Council President, in his official capacity, JAMES DOYLE, Hoboken City Council President, in his official capacity, RAS J. BARAKA, Mayor of Newark, in his official capacity, STEVEN FULOP, Mayor of Jersey City, in his official capacity, ANDREW SAYEGH, Mayor of Paterson, in his official capacity and RAVINDER S. BHALLA, Mayor of Hoboken, in his official capacity |
| 26-3141 |
| September 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (KR) [Entered: 09/09/2026 12:39 PM]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (KR) [Entered: 09/09/2026 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 09/09/2026 12:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant USA in District Court No. 2:25-cv-05081. (KR) [Entered: 09/09/2026 12:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
