Yusuf Ibrahim v. Amy Emrich, et al
Plaintiff: YUSUF IBRAHIM
Defendant: AMY EMRICH, in her individual and official capacities and DERRICK BODTMANN, in his invidual and official capacities
Case Number: 26-3218
Filed: September 4, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER (Clerk) denying motion requesting waiver of filing fees based on grant of indigent status in Superior Court of New Jersey filed by Appellant Yusuf Ibrahim. Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), a prisoner must pay the required fee when filing an appeal. Even if the Appellant was previously granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in another Court, he is obligated to either remit the full docketing and filing fee of $605.00 or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this Court. Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Appellant must either pay to the district court the entire docketing and filing fee of $605.00 or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, along with an addendum to the affidavit in support of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis , a completed form authorizing assessments to be made from his prison account, and a certified prison account statement, in this Court. Failure to comply with this Order within the time stated, will result in the dismissal of the appeal pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1 without further notice. (KR) [Entered: 10/29/2026 08:58 AM]
October 7, 2026 Filing 4 LETTER MOTION filed by Appellant Yusuf Ibrahim to Continue In Forma Pauperis Status granted by State Court before removal to District Court. Service made by the Clerk's Office via CM.ECF on 10/21/2026. (PDB) [Entered: 10/21/2026 11:41 AM]
September 4, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 09/04/2026 01:08 PM]
September 4, 2026 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 09/04/2026 01:08 PM]
September 4, 2026 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Yusuf Ibrahim in District Court No. 3:24-cv-01780. (PDB) [Entered: 09/04/2026 01:06 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Yusuf Ibrahim v. Amy Emrich, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: YUSUF IBRAHIM
Represented By: Yusuf Ibrahim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMY EMRICH, in her individual and official capacities
Represented By: Michael B. McNeil Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DERRICK BODTMANN, in his invidual and official capacities
Represented By: Michael B. McNeil Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?