Paris James v. John Wetzel, et al
| Paris L. James |
| John E. Wetzel, Secretary of PA DOC, Christopher Belles, DiNapoli and Green, Sgt, SCI, Coal Township |
| 26-3350 |
| September 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) To facilitate electronic filing for larger groups of parties represented by the same attorney, the first named party in each group will be the designated filer, as follows: For all parties represented by any attorney from the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, the designated filer shall be John E. Wetzel. Counsel is advised that the designated filer is for cm/ecf filing purposes only. Names of all represented parties must be listed on all forms, motions and briefs. Attorneys representing smaller groups of parties must select all individual persons or entities as filers in cm/ecf. (AMR) [Entered: 09/17/2026 12:34 PM]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 09/17/2026 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 09/17/2026 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Paris L. James in District Court No. 1:21-cv-01069. (AMR) [Entered: 09/17/2026 12:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
