Termaine Hicks v. City of Philadelphia
| Termaine Hicks |
| City of Philadelphia and Mary Bridget Smith, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brian Smith, Deceased |
| 26-3449 |
| October 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (NMB) [Entered: 10/01/2026 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (NMB) [Entered: 10/01/2026 03:22 PM] |
Filing 2
ORDER (Clerk) To facilitate electronic filing for larger groups of parties represented by the same attorney, the first named party in each group will be the designated filer, as follows: For all parties represented by Danielle E. Walsh, Esq. or any other attorney from the City of Philadelphia Law Department, the designated filer shall be City of Philadelphia. Counsel is advised that the designated filer is for cm/ecf filing purposes only. Names of all represented parties must be listed on all forms, motions, and briefs. Attorneys representing smaller groups of parties must select all individual persons or entities as filers in cm/ecf. (NMB) [Entered: 10/01/2026 03:21 PM]
|
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Termaine Hicks in District Court No. 2:22-cv-00977. (NMB) [Entered: 10/01/2026 03:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.