John Doe 3, et al v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc, et al
Petitioner: John Doe 3 and John Doe 4, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent: LexisNexis Risk Solutions, INC
Case Number: 26-8041
Filed: September 10, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is referred to the same panel as that which will consider the petition for permission to appeal. The Clerk's Office will hold the unredacted version of the petition under provisional seal pending the Court's ruling. (TMM) [Entered: 09/18/2026 04:34 PM]
September 17, 2026 Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Rasmeet K. Chahil on behalf of Respondent(s) LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.. [26-8041] (RKC) [Entered: 09/17/2026 11:53 AM]
September 17, 2026 Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Gavin J. Rooney on behalf of Respondent(s) LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.. [26-8041] (GJR) [Entered: 09/17/2026 11:51 AM]
September 17, 2026 Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from A. Matthew Boxer on behalf of Respondent(s) LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.. [26-8041] (AMB) [Entered: 09/17/2026 11:49 AM]
September 16, 2026 Filing 4 ECF FILER: UNOPPOSED Motion filed by Petitioners John Doe 3 and John Doe 4 to order dated 09/11/2026, to seal Unredacted Petition for Permission to Appeal Under Rule 23(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Certain District Court Records on Appeal. Certificate of Service dated 09/16/2026. Service made by ECF. [26-8041] (ARS) [Entered: 09/16/2026 04:38 PM]
September 11, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (GCH) [Entered: 09/11/2026 11:10 AM]
September 11, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER (Clerk) Petitioners seek permission to appeal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f), an August 26, 2026 District Court order, denying a motion for class certification. Under Rule 23(f), any petition for permission to appeal must be filed with the circuit clerk within 14 days after the order is entered. The above-docketed petition was filed on September 10, 2026. Given this, this Court may not have authority to consider the petition for permission to appeal. Any response to this jurisdictional issue and/or the petition for permission to appeal must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. In addition, multiple volumes of the addenda were filed under seal. Within five (5) days of the date of this order, Petitioner must file a motion for leave to file those documents under seal. The motion to seal must specify the scope of the relief requested, the basis for sealing, and the desired duration of the sealing order. Any response to the motion to seal must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. The sealed volumes of the addenda will be held provisionally under seal pending the filing and disposition of the motion. (GCH) [Entered: 09/11/2026 11:10 AM]
September 10, 2026 Filing 1 Petition for Leave to Appeal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f) filed by Petitioners John Doe 3 and John Doe 4. Received on 09/10/2026. Certificate of Service dated 09/10/2026. Service made by ECF. (GCH) [Entered: 09/11/2026 10:55 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Doe 3, et al v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Doe 3
Represented By: Adam R. Shaw Esq.
Represented By: Rajiv D. Parikh Esq.
Represented By: Jessica A. Merejo Esq.
Represented By: Mark C. Mao Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Doe 4, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Adam R. Shaw Esq.
Represented By: Rajiv D. Parikh Esq.
Represented By: Jessica A. Merejo Esq.
Represented By: Mark C. Mao Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: LexisNexis Risk Solutions, INC
Represented By: Gavin J. Rooney Esq.
Represented By: Rasmeet K. Chahil Esq.
Represented By: A. Matthew Boxer Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?