USA v. Haro-Torres
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
MAURO ALEJANDRO HARO-TORRES, also known as Julian Montez, also known as Jose Rivera-Garcia, also known as Luis Rojo Lopez, also known as Mario Flores, also known as Julian Montez Villegas, also known as Luis Fojo Lopez, also known as Luis Rojo, also known |
06-31093 |
October 26, 2006 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 501174065 |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Haro-Torres | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Stephen Andrew Higginson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: MAURO ALEJANDRO HARO-TORRES, also known as Julian Montez, also known as Jose Rivera-Garcia, also known as Luis Rojo Lopez, also known as Mario Flores, also known as Julian Montez Villegas, also known as Luis Fojo Lopez, also known as Luis Rojo, also known | |
Represented By: | Mauro Alejandro Haro-Torres |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.