Dowling v. Georgia-Pacific Corp, et al
Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee: GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP
Third Party Defendant - Appellant: KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT INC
Case Number: 08-30218
Filed: February 28, 2008
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Liability

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 19, 2008 Dowling v. Georgia-Pacific Corp, et al
December 10, 2008 Dowling v. Georgia-Pacific Corp, et al

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 920081210 Opinion
May 19, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 920080519 Opinion
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dowling v. Georgia-Pacific Corp, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant-third party plaintiff - appellee: GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP
Represented By: Vance Arnold Gibbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Third party defendant - appellant: KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT INC
Represented By: Kenneth Hugh Laborde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?