USA v. Eduardo Ramos-Mendez
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: EDUARDO RAMOS-MENDEZ, also known as Eddie, also known as Eduardo Navarro Ramos
Case Number: 09-30341
Filed: April 27, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 23, 2010 USA v. Eduardo Ramos-Mendez

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 920100423
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Eduardo Ramos-Mendez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Camille Ann Domingue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: EDUARDO RAMOS-MENDEZ, also known as Eddie, also known as Eduardo Navarro Ramos
Represented By: David Bruce Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?