In re: Amy Unknown

Petitioner: In re: AMY UNKNOWN
Defendant - Respondent: DOYLE RANDALL PAROLINE
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 09-41238
Filed: December 17, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
March 22, 2011 In re: Amy Unknown
January 27, 2012 Summary In Re: Amy Unknown
October 1, 2012 Summary In Re: Amy Unknown
November 19, 2012 Summary In Re: Amy Unknown
June 10, 2014 Summary In Re: Amy Unknown

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 1, 2012 502005093 Opinion or Order of the Court REVISED PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [7193980-2] [09-41238, 09-41254]
Search for this case: In re: Amy Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: AMY UNKNOWN
Represented By: James R. Marsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - respondent: DOYLE RANDALL PAROLINE
Represented By: Fred Rimes Files
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Amanda Louise Griffith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?