Texas Municipal Police Assn v. David Reisman
Plaintiff - Appellant: TEXAS MUNICIPAL POLICE ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID A REISMAN, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Ethics Commission
Case Number: 09-50741
Filed: August 21, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 25, 2010 Texas Municipal Police Assn v. David Reisman

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 920100625
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Texas Municipal Police Assn v. David Reisman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: TEXAS MUNICIPAL POLICE ASSOCIATION
Represented By: Randall C. Doubrava
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DAVID A REISMAN, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Ethics Commission
Represented By: Erika M. Kane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?