USA v. $1,157,400.18 In US Currency

Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $1,157,400.18 IN CURRENCY
Claimant - Appellant: FABIAN AURIGNAC
Case Number: 10-40950
Filed: September 27, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other forfeitures and penalty suits

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
May 18, 2011 USA v. $1,157,400.18 In US Currency

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 18, 2011 511481950 Opinion or Order of the Court UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [10-40950 Affirmed] Judge: TMR , Judge: JLD , Judge: EBC. Mandate pull date is 07/11/2011 [10-40950]
Search for this case: USA v. $1,157,400.18 In US Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Allan Alvin Hoffmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $1,157,400.18 IN CURRENCY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant - appellant: FABIAN AURIGNAC
Represented By: Fabian Aurignac
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.