EEOC v. Boh Brothers Const Co., L.L.C.
| EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION |
| BOH BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC |
| 11-30770 |
| August 23, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Jobs (Civil Rights) |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 EEOC v. Boh Bros. Constr. Co., LLC
|
|
EEOC v. Boh Brothers Const Co., L.L.C.
|
|
EEOC v. Boh Brothers Const Co., L.L.C.
|
|
EEOC v. Boh Brothers Const Co., L.L.C.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
502391543
REVISED PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [7468709-2] [11-30770]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: EEOC v. Boh Brothers Const Co., L.L.C. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Thomas Juge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: BOH BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Walter W. Christy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
