Reynaldo Ramirez v. Jim Wells County, Texa
REYNALDO RAMIREZ |
JOSE "TASER JOE" MARTINEZ, Individually |
11-41109 |
October 11, 2011 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Ramirez v. Martinez |
Reynaldo Ramirez v. Jim Wells County, Texas |
Reynaldo Ramirez v. Jim Wells County, Texas |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 502256855 REVISED PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [7372714-2] [11-41109] |
Filing 502253355 REVISED PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [7364915-2] [11-41109] |
Filing 512242290 PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [11-41109 Reversed in Part and Dismissed in Part] Judge: EHJ , Judge: EMG , Judge: ECP Mandate pull date is 06/05/2013 [11-41109] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Reynaldo Ramirez v. Jim Wells County, Texa | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: REYNALDO RAMIREZ | |
Represented By: | Christopher John Gale |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: JOSE "TASER JOE" MARTINEZ, Individually | |
Represented By: | Myra Kay Morris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.