Building Four Shady Oaks Mgmt v. FDIC
| BUILDING FOUR SHADY OAKS MANAGEMENT L.P. |
| FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for Guaranty Bank, formerly a Texas Banking Company |
| 12-10080 |
| January 24, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Building Four Shady Oaks Mgmt v. FDIC |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
512093527
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [12-10080 Affirmed ] Judge: WED , Judge: EHJ , Judge: JES Mandate pull date is 02/11/2013 [12-10080]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Building Four Shady Oaks Mgmt v. FDIC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: BUILDING FOUR SHADY OAKS MANAGEMENT L.P. | |
| Represented By: | William Nolan Warren |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for Guaranty Bank, formerly a Texas Banking Company | |
| Represented By: | Dawn Estes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
