Marcus Payne v. Adam Park
| MARCUS J. PAYNE |
| ADAM PARKS, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Lieutenant of Texas Department of Public Safety - Private Security Bureau |
| 12-10841 |
| August 15, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
512332159
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [12-10841 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EGJ , Judge: JES , Judge: EBC. Mandate pull date is 08/26/2013; denying motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Marcus J. Payne [7206014-2] [12-10841]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Marcus Payne v. Adam Park | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: MARCUS J. PAYNE | |
| Represented By: | Marcus J. Payne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: ADAM PARKS, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Lieutenant of Texas Department of Public Safety - Private Security Bureau | |
| Represented By: | Peter B. Plotts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
