DartAmericA, Incorporated v. MEMC Pasadena, Incorporated
| MEMC PASADENA, INCORPORATED |
| C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INCORPORATED |
| 12-20157 |
| March 12, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Recovery/Enforcement |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| DartAmericA, Incorporated v. MEMC Pasadena, Incorp |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
512093981
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [12-20157 Affirmed] Judge: EGJ , Judge: FPB , Judge: SAH. Mandate pull date is 01/16/2013 [12-20157]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: DartAmericA, Incorporated v. MEMC Pasadena, Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant-third party plaintiff - appellee: MEMC PASADENA, INCORPORATED | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Carl Chae |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Third party defendant - appellant: C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INCORPORATED | |
| Represented By: | Steven Jay Watkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
