Paul Clarke v. Steve Rader
Petitioner - Appellant: PAUL CLARKE
Respondent - Appellee: STEVE RADER, Warden
Case Number: 12-30252
Filed: March 9, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 25, 2013 Summary Clarke v. Rader

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 512285482 PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [12-30252 Affirmed] Judge: CES , Judge: FPB , Judge: SAH. Mandate pull date is 07/15/2013; denying motion to supplement the record on appeal filed by Appellant Mr. Paul Clarke [7258725-2]; granting motion for reconsideration filed by Appellant Mr. Paul Clarke [7256921-2] [12-30252]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Paul Clarke v. Steve Rader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: PAUL CLARKE
Represented By: Mary Ann Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: STEVE RADER, Warden
Represented By: Dylan C. Alge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?