Louis Pillette, et al v. M-I, L.L.C.

Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS PILLETTE and BERT GRANT
Defendant - Appellee: M-I, L.L.C., doing business as MI Swaco
Case Number: 12-31212
Filed: December 4, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs (Civil Rights)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
May 28, 2013 Louis Pillette, et al v. M-I, L.L.C.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 28, 2013 512254731 Opinion or Order of the Court UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [12-31212 Affirmed ] Judge: TMR , Judge: EGJ , Judge: WED Mandate pull date is 06/18/2013 [12-31212]
Search for this case: Louis Pillette, et al v. M-I, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: LOUIS PILLETTE
Represented By: Raven Matthews Pillette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: BERT GRANT
Represented By: Raven Matthews Pillette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: M-I, L.L.C., doing business as MI Swaco
Represented By: Samuel Zurik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.