Maceo Downey v. Mike Barry
| MACEO DOWNEY |
| MIKE BARRY, also known as Unknown Officer Galveston County Jail, Deputy |
| 12-40337 |
| March 29, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
512182813
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [12-40337 Affirmed ] Judge: PEH , Judge: PRO , Judge: LHS Mandate pull date is 04/11/2013; granting motion to strike portion of brief filed by Appellee Mr. Mike Barry [7194717-2]; denying motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Maceo Downey [7062352-2] [12-40337]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Maceo Downey v. Mike Barry | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: MACEO DOWNEY | |
| Represented By: | Maceo Downey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: MIKE BARRY, also known as Unknown Officer Galveston County Jail, Deputy | |
| Represented By: | Donald Steven Glywasky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
