State of Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel Jim Hood, Attorney General
Defendant - Appellant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INCORPORATED, CHI MEI CORPORATION, CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION, formerly known as Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INCORPORATED, formerly known as International Display Technology USA, Incorporated, CMO JAPAN COMPANY, LIMITED, formerly known as International Display Technology, Limited, HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION, HITACHI, LIMITED, JAPAN DISPLAY EAST, INCORPORATED, HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), LG DISPLAY COMPANY, LIMITED, formerly known as LG Phillips LCD Company, Limited, LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INCORPORATED, formerly known as LGD LCD America, Incorporated, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD, SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INCORPORATED, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INCORPORATED, SHARP CORPORATION, SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY COMPANY, LIMITED, formerly known as Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Company, Limited, TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INCORPORATED and TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
Case Number: 12-60704
Filed: September 13, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 21, 2012 Summary State of Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corp., et al
March 19, 2014 State of Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corporation,

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: State of Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel Jim Hood, Attorney General
Represented By: Meredith McCollum Aldridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION
Represented By: Luther T. Munford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Luther T. Munford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: CHI MEI CORPORATION
Represented By: Harrison J. Frahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION, formerly known as Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation
Represented By: Harrison J. Frahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INCORPORATED, formerly known as International Display Technology USA, Incorporated
Represented By: Harrison J. Frahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: CMO JAPAN COMPANY, LIMITED, formerly known as International Display Technology, Limited
Represented By: Harrison J. Frahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: HITACHI, LIMITED
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: JAPAN DISPLAY EAST, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA)
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: LG DISPLAY COMPANY, LIMITED, formerly known as LG Phillips LCD Company, Limited
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INCORPORATED, formerly known as LGD LCD America, Incorporated
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: SHARP CORPORATION
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY COMPANY, LIMITED, formerly known as Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Company, Limited
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Hugh F. Bangasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?