In re: Radmax, Limited
| In re: RADMAX, LIMITED |
| ERIN NORTH |
| 13-40462 |
| April 26, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 In re: Radmax, Ltd.
|
|
In Re: Radmax, Limited
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
512279201
PUBLISHED OPINION ORDER FILED. [13-40462 Reversed] Judge: JES , Judge: ECP , Judge: SAH; granting petition for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Radmax, Limited [7350543-2]; granting motion to stay district court proceedings filed by Petitioner Radmax, Limited [7385078-2] (ISSUED AS & FOR THE MANDATE) [13-40462]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Radmax, Limited | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: RADMAX, LIMITED | |
| Represented By: | Sara M. Berkeley |
| Represented By: | Michael Alan Yanof |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - respondent: ERIN NORTH | |
| Represented By: | William Sam Hommel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
