James Bigby v. William Stephens, Director
JAMES EUGENE BIGBY |
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION |
13-70020 |
June 11, 2013 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
James Bigby v. William Stephens, Director |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 502874474 UNPUBLISHED OPINION ORDER FILED. [13-70020 Affirmed ] Judge: EHJ , Judge: JLD , Judge: CH; denying motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. James Eugene Bigby (ISSUED AS & FOR THE MANDATE) [7527434-2] [13-70020] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: James Bigby v. William Stephens, Director | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: JAMES EUGENE BIGBY | |
Represented By: | John W. Stickels |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION | |
Represented By: | Stephen M. Hoffman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.