Roger Price v. Warden Forcht Wade Corrtl Ctr
Petitioner - Appellant: ROGER CLAYTON PRICE
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN FORCHT WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Case Number: 14-30349
Filed: April 11, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 12, 2015 Summary Price v. Warden
May 26, 2015 Summary Roger Price v. Warden Forcht Wade Corrtl Ctr

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 503054373 REVISED PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [7911439-2] [14-30349]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Roger Price v. Warden Forcht Wade Corrtl Ctr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: ROGER CLAYTON PRICE
Represented By: Roger Clayton Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: WARDEN FORCHT WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Represented By: Don M. Burkett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?