Dustin Wright v. Excel Paralubes, et al
| DUSTIN BLAKE WRIGHT |
| EXCEL PARALUBES, incorrectly identified as Excel Paralubes Incorporated and CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, incorrectly identified as Conoco Phillips Company Incorporated |
| 14-31215 |
| October 23, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Personal Liability |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dustin Wright v. Excel Paralubes, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: DUSTIN BLAKE WRIGHT | |
| Represented By: | Marvin Charles Brandt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: EXCEL PARALUBES, incorrectly identified as Excel Paralubes Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Sanford Green |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, incorrectly identified as Conoco Phillips Company Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Sanford Green |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
