USA v. Antonio Maldonado
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
ANTONIO MALDONADO |
14-40562 |
May 30, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
USA v. Antonio Maldonado |
USA v. Antonio Maldonado |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 503376826 UNPUBLISHED OPINION ORDER FILED on Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. [14-40562 Vacated and Remanded] Judge: ECP , Judge: PRO , Judge: JEG; denying as moot motion to recall mandate filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Maldonado [7966276-2]; denying as moot motion to file rehearing out of time filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Maldonado [7966276-3] [14-40562] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Antonio Maldonado | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Renata Ann Gowie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: ANTONIO MALDONADO | |
Represented By: | Marjorie A. Meyers |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.