Felix Lozano-Rodriguez v. Jeh Johnson, et al

Petitioner - Appellant: FELIX LOZANO-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee: JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 14-40740
Filed: July 11, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees

Search for this case: Felix Lozano-Rodriguez v. Jeh Johnson, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: FELIX LOZANO-RODRIGUEZ
Represented By: Norma Nelly Vielma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Renata Ann Gowie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.