Mary Ainsworth v. Cargotec USA, Incorporated
| Mary P. Ainsworth, Widow and Personal Representative of James T. Ainsworth, Deceased, Individually and on Behalf of All Wrongful Death Beneficiaries, including the Minor Children, S.A., D.A., and M.A., Mary P. Ainsworth is Mother and Next Friend |
| Cargotec USA, Incorporated, formerly known as HIAB, Incorporated, formerly known as Cargotec, Incorporated, Moffett Engineering, Limited and John Does 1-5 |
| 14-60171 |
| March 12, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| P.I. - Product Liability |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 53 MANDATE ISSUED. Mandate pull date satisfied. [14-60171] (SBS) [Entered: 01/06/2015 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 50 JUDGMENT ENTERED AND FILED. [14-60171] (JRS) [Entered: 12/12/2014 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 49 UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-60171 Affirmed] Judge: WED , Judge: JLW , Judge: CH. Mandate pull date is 01/05/2015 [14-60171] (JRS) [Entered: 12/12/2014 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 46 ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD before Judges Davis, Wiener, Haynes. Arguing Person Information Updated for: John G. Corlew arguing for Appellant Mary P. Ainsworth; Arguing Person Information Updated for: Lisa A. Reppeto arguing for Appellee Limited Moffett Engineering [14-60171] (SME) [Entered: 12/03/2014 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 44 CASE CALENDARED for oral argument on Wednesday, 12/03/2014 in New Orleans in the East Courtroom -- AM session. In accordance with our policy, lead counsel only will receive via email at a later date a copy of the court's docket and an acknowledgment form. All other counsel of record should monitor the court's website for the posting of the oral argument calendars.. [14-60171] (SME) [Entered: 10/22/2014 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 43 CASE TENTATIVELY calendared for oral argument for the week of 12/01/2014. [14-60171] (GAM) [Entered: 10/17/2014 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 35 Paper copies of appellant reply brief filed by Appellant Ms. Mary P. Ainsworth in 14-60171 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. Paper Copies of Brief due deadline satisfied. [14-60171] (DDL) [Entered: 08/29/2014 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 34 APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED by Ms. Mary P. Ainsworth Date of service: 08/25/2014 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Corlew; Attorney for Appellees: Naylor, Raulston, Reppeto [14-60171] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED. # of Copies Provided: 0 Reply Brief deadline satisfied. Paper Copies of Brief due on 09/02/2014 for Appellant Mary P. Ainsworth. [14-60171] (John G. Corlew ) [Entered: 08/25/2014 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 33 PHONE EXTENSION CONFIRMED for Appellant Ms. Mary P. Ainsworth. Extension granted to and including 08/25/2014. Reply Brief deadline updated to 08/25/2014 for Appellant Mary P. Ainsworth [14-60171] (SBS) [Entered: 08/12/2014 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 32 Paper copies of appellee brief filed by Appellee Moffett Engineering, Limited in 14-60171 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. Paper Copies of Brief due deadline satisfied. [14-60171] (CMB) [Entered: 08/05/2014 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 31 APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED by Appellee Moffett Engineering, Limited. Date of service: 07/30/2014, via email - Attorney for Appellant: Corlew; Attorney for Appellees: Naylor, Raulston, Reppeto [14-60171] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED. # of Copies Provided: 0. E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied. Paper Copies of Brief due on 08/06/2014, for Appellee Moffett Engineering, Limited. Reply Brief due on 08/18/2014, for Appellant Mary P. Ainsworth. [14-60171] (Keith Robinson Raulston ) [Entered: 07/30/2014 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 30 PHONE EXTENSION CONFIRMED for Appellee Moffett Engineering, Limited. Extension granted to and including 07/30/2014. E/Res's Brief deadline updated to 07/30/2014 for Appellee Moffett Engineering, Limited [14-60171] (DDL) [Entered: 06/26/2014 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 29 Paper copies of record excerpts filed by Appellant Ms. Mary P. Ainsworth in 14-60171 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 4. Paper Copies of Record Excerpts due deadline satisfied. [14-60171] (DDL) [Entered: 06/04/2014 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 28 Paper copies of appellant brief filed by Appellant Ms. Mary P. Ainsworth in 14-60171 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. Paper Copies of Brief due deadline satisfied. [14-60171] (DDL) [Entered: 06/04/2014 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 27 RECORD EXCERPTS MADE SUFFICIENT filed by Appellant Ms. Mary P. Ainsworth in 14-60171 [ # 26 ]. Sufficient Record Excerpts deadline satisfied. Paper Copies of Record Excerpts due on 06/04/2014 for Appellant Mary P. Ainsworth. [14-60171] (DDL) [Entered: 05/30/2014 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 26 RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Ms. Mary P. Ainsworth. Date of service: 05/28/2014 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Corlew; Attorney for Appellees: Naylor, Raulston, Reppeto [14-60171] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED. Record Excerpts NOT Sufficient as they require TABS/PAGE SEPARATORS ARE REQUIRED. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0 Sufficient Record Excerpts due on 06/12/2014 for Appellant Mary P. Ainsworth [14-60171] (John G. Corlew ) [Entered: 05/28/2014 05:56 PM] |
| Filing 25 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Ms. Mary P. Ainsworth. Date of service: 05/28/2014 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Corlew; Attorney for Appellees: Naylor, Raulston, Reppeto [14-60171] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED. # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Paper Copies of Brief due on 06/03/2014 for Appellant Mary P. Ainsworth.. Appellee's Brief due on 06/30/2014 for Appellee Moffett Engineering, Limited [14-60171] (John G. Corlew ) [Entered: 05/28/2014 05:51 PM] |
| Filing 23 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/28/2014 for Appellant Mary P. Ainsworth. [14-60171] (AGL) [Entered: 04/18/2014 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 22 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [14-60171] (AGL) [Entered: 04/18/2014 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 18 CASE CAPTION updated. Involvement terminated for Appellee Cargotec USA, Incorporated in 14-60171. Reason: erroneously included as an appellee at case opening (see stipulation of dismissal at dc docket # 202). [14-60171] (AGL) [Entered: 04/09/2014 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Lisa A. Reppeto for party(s) Appellee Moffett Engineering, Limited, in case 14-60171 [14-60171] (DDL) [Entered: 04/09/2014 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 19 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Keith Robinson Raulston for party(s) Appellee Moffett Engineering, Limited, in case 14-60171 [14-60171] (DDL) [Entered: 04/09/2014 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney John G. Corlew for Appellant Mary P. Ainsworth in 14-60171 [14-60171] (DDL) [Entered: 03/21/2014 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Mary P. Ainsworth advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [14-60171] (CB) [Entered: 03/20/2014 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Ms. Mary P. Ainsworth for the Court to process. [14-60171] (John G. Corlew ) [Entered: 03/20/2014 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 4 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [4] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Electronic ROA due on 04/01/2014. [14-60171] (SBS) [Entered: 03/17/2014 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Mary P. Ainsworth [14-60171] (SBS) [Entered: 03/12/2014 09:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mary Ainsworth v. Cargotec USA, Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Mary P. Ainsworth, Widow and Personal Representative of James T. Ainsworth, Deceased, Individually and on Behalf of All Wrongful Death Beneficiaries, including the Minor Children, S.A., D.A., and M.A., Mary P. Ainsworth is Mother and Next Friend | |
| Represented By: | John G. Corlew |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Cargotec USA, Incorporated, formerly known as HIAB, Incorporated, formerly known as Cargotec, Incorporated | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Moffett Engineering, Limited | |
| Represented By: | Keith Robinson Raulston Esq. |
| Represented By: | Eugene Randolph Naylor Esq. |
| Represented By: | Lisa A. Reppeto |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: John Does 1-5 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
