William Rayford v. William Stephens, Director
WILLIAM EARL RAYFORD |
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION |
14-70031 |
September 30, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
William Rayford v. William Stephens, Director |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 503051595 UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-70031 Affirmed ] Judge: PEH , Judge: WED , Judge: JWE; denying motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. William Earl Rayford (ISSUED AS AND FOR THE MANDATE) [7810938-2] [14-70031] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: William Rayford v. William Stephens, Director | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: WILLIAM EARL RAYFORD | |
Represented By: | Bruce Edward Anton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION | |
Represented By: | Jefferson David Clendenin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.