Mike Gray v. Brad Livingston, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN GRAY
Defendant - Appellee: BRAD LIVINGSTON, In His Official and Individual Capacity, Including Any Successor In Office as Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Division Agents and Employees, As Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal J, SHARON FELFE HOWELL, In Her Official and Individual Capacity, Including Any Successor In Office as General Counsel of Brad Livingston and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Division Agents and Employees, as General Counsel of the Texas Department, BETTIE LOUISE WELLS, In Her Official and Individual Capacity, Including Any Successor In Office as General Counsel of the Parole Board Presiding Officer, Members and Agents or Employees, as General Counsel and RISSIE OWENS, In Her Official and Individual Capacity, Including Any Successor In Office as Presiding Officer of the Parole Board, Agents and Employees, as Board Presiding Officer
Case Number: 15-20674
Filed: November 16, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mike Gray v. Brad Livingston, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JOHN GRAY
Represented By: John Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: BRAD LIVINGSTON, In His Official and Individual Capacity, Including Any Successor In Office as Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Division Agents and Employees, As Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal J
Represented By: Leah O'Leary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SHARON FELFE HOWELL, In Her Official and Individual Capacity, Including Any Successor In Office as General Counsel of Brad Livingston and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Division Agents and Employees, as General Counsel of the Texas Department
Represented By: Leah O'Leary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: BETTIE LOUISE WELLS, In Her Official and Individual Capacity, Including Any Successor In Office as General Counsel of the Parole Board Presiding Officer, Members and Agents or Employees, as General Counsel
Represented By: Leah O'Leary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: RISSIE OWENS, In Her Official and Individual Capacity, Including Any Successor In Office as Presiding Officer of the Parole Board, Agents and Employees, as Board Presiding Officer
Represented By: Leah O'Leary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?