Derrick Dillard v. City of Austin
| Derrick Dillard |
| City of Austin, Texas |
| 15-50779 |
| August 21, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Amer w/Disabilities Act-Employment |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 66 MANDATE ISSUED. Mandate pull date satisfied. [15-50779] (PAC) [Entered: 10/10/2016 08:48 AM] |
| Filing 63 JUDGMENT ENTERED AND FILED. [15-50779] (JMA) [Entered: 09/16/2016 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 62 PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [15-50779 Affirmed ] Judge: LHS , Judge: GJC , Judge: HSO Mandate pull date is 10/07/2016 [15-50779] (JMA) [Entered: 09/16/2016 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 58 ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD before Judges Southwick, Costa, Ozerden. Arguing Person Information Updated for: Megan Mosby arguing for Appellee Texas City of Austin; Arguing Person Information Updated for: Kell Asher Simon arguing for Appellant Derrick Dillard [15-50779] (PFT) [Entered: 04/25/2016 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 55 Paper copies of corrected reply brief filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard in 15-50779 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 04/20/2016 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 53 Paper copies of brief filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard in 15-50779 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. Paper Copies of Brief due deadline satisfied. [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 04/20/2016 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 50 CORRECTED REPLY BRIEF filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard ..Paper Copies of Brief due on 04/20/2016 for Appellant Derrick Dillard. [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 04/19/2016 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 49 CORRECTED BRIEF filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard ..Paper Copies of Brief due on 04/25/2016 for Appellant Derrick Dillard. [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 04/19/2016 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 48 COURT ORDER granting motion to file corrected appellant's brief and reply brief filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard [ # 46 ] [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 04/19/2016 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 46 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard for leave to file document [46]. Date of service: 04/18/2016 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Simon; Attorney for Appellees: Lloyd, Mosby [15-50779] (Kell Asher Simon ) [Entered: 04/18/2016 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 45 LETTER filed designating Attorney Megan Mosby as lead counsel for the City of Austin. [15-50779] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: LETTER filed by Appellee City of Austin, Texas Designation of Attorney in Charge The purpose of this letter is to inform the clerk that the Appelle's lead counsel has changed.. Date of Service: 03/21/2016 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Simon; Attorney for Appellees: Lloyd, Mosby [15-50779] (Megan Mosby ) [Entered: 03/21/2016 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 44 COURT ORDER granting motion view sealed exhibits filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard [ # 39 ] [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 03/17/2016 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 40 CASE CALENDARED for oral argument on Monday, 04/25/2016 in New Orleans in the East Courtroom -- AM session. In accordance with our policy, lead counsel only will receive via email at a later date a copy of the court's docket and an acknowledgment form. All other counsel of record should monitor the court's website for the posting of the oral argument calendars.. [15-50779] (PFT) [Entered: 03/15/2016 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 39 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard to view sealed document.. Date of service: 03/10/2016 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Simon; Attorney for Appellees: Lloyd, Mosby [15-50779] (Kell Asher Simon ) [Entered: 03/10/2016 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 38 CASE TENTATIVELY calendared for oral argument for the week of 04/25/2016. [15-50779] (GAM) [Entered: 02/23/2016 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 33 Paper copies of appellant reply brief filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard in 15-50779 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. Paper Copies of Brief due deadline satisfied. [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 01/14/2016 08:28 AM] |
| Filing 32 APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 Reply Brief deadline satisfied. Paper Copies of Brief due on 01/13/2016 for Appellant Derrick Dillard. [15-50779] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED by Mr. Derrick Dillard Date of service: 01/07/2016 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Simon; Attorney for Appellees: Lloyd, Mosby [15-50779] (Kell Asher Simon ) [Entered: 01/07/2016 10:08 PM] |
| Filing 31 Paper copies of appellee brief filed by Appellee City of Austin Texas in 15-50779 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. Paper Copies of Brief due deadline satisfied. [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 12/21/2015 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 30 CLERK ORDER granting motion to extend time to file reply brief filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard [ # 26 ] Reply Brief deadline updated to 01/07/2016 for Appellant Derrick Dillard. [15-50779] (MBC) [Entered: 12/11/2015 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 26 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard to extend time to file reply brief until 01/07/2016 at 11:59 pm [26]. Date of service: 12/11/2015 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Simon; Attorney for Appellees: Lloyd, Mosby [15-50779] (Kell Asher Simon ) [Entered: 12/11/2015 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 25 BRIEF MADE SUFFICIENT filed by Appellee City of Austin Texas in 15-50779 [ # 24 ]. Sufficient Brief deadline satisfied. Paper Copies of Brief due on 12/14/2015 for Appellee City of Austin Texas. [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 12/09/2015 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 24 APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED . Brief NOT Sufficient as the use of "id" is not allowed when citing to the record. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0 E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 12/22/2015 for Appellee City of Austin Texas.. Reply Brief due on 12/24/2015 for Appellant Derrick Dillard [15-50779] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S MEMORANDUM BRIEF FILED by Appellee City of Austin Texas. Date of service: 12/07/2015 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Simon; Attorney for Appellees: Lloyd, Mosby [15-50779] (Megan Mosby ) [Entered: 12/07/2015 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 23 Paper copies of record excerpts filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard in 15-50779 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 4. Paper Copies of Record Excerpts due deadline satisfied. [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 11/12/2015 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 22 Paper copies of appellant brief filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard in 15-50779 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. Paper Copies of Brief due deadline satisfied. [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 11/12/2015 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 21 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 12/07/2015 for Appellee City of Austin Texas. Paper Copies of Brief due on 11/10/2015 for Appellant Derrick Dillard. [15-50779] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Derrick Dillard. Date of service: 11/02/2015 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Simon; Attorney for Appellees: Lloyd, Mosby [15-50779] (Kell Asher Simon ) [Entered: 11/02/2015 11:30 PM] |
| Filing 20 RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0 Paper Copies of Record Excerpts due on 11/10/2015 for Appellant Derrick Dillard. [15-50779] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard. Date of service: 11/02/2015 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Simon; Attorney for Appellees: Lloyd, Mosby [15-50779] (Kell Asher Simon ) [Entered: 11/02/2015 10:04 PM] |
| Filing 19 JOINT EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard and Appellee City of Austin Texas. Extension Denied Reason: We do not grant extensions ahead of time to project future dates. The appellant's brief is due 11/2/15. Appellee's brief will be due 30 days from filing of appellant's brief and at that time appellee may move for an extension of time if necessary. [15-50779] (MBC) [Entered: 10/16/2015 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 18 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellee City of Austin Texas for filing Defendant-Appellee's Brief until 12/16/2015. [15-50779] (Andralee Cain Lloyd ) [Entered: 10/15/2015 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Megan Mosby for party(s) Appellee City of Austin Texas, in case 15-50779 [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 10/14/2015 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No.. THE IMAGE FOR THIS FILING WILL NOT BE VIEWABLE AS IT CONTAINS SENSITIVE INFORMATION. [15-50779] (Megan Mosby ) [Entered: 10/13/2015 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 14 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/02/2015 for Appellant Derrick Dillard. [15-50779] (SMH) [Entered: 09/21/2015 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [15-50779] (SMH) [Entered: 09/21/2015 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Andralee Cain Lloyd for Appellee City of Austin Texas in 15-50779 [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 09/16/2015 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Andralee Cain Lloyd for City of Austin Texas for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes.. THE IMAGE FOR THIS FILING WILL NOT BE VIEWABLE AS IT CONTAINS SENSITIVE INFORMATION. [15-50779] (Andralee Cain Lloyd ) [Entered: 09/14/2015 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Kell Asher Simon for Appellant Derrick Dillard in 15-50779 [15-50779] (SDH) [Entered: 09/03/2015 08:24 AM] |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 1:14-CV-7. Electronic ROA due on 09/17/2015. [15-50779] (MBC) [Entered: 09/02/2015 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard advising transcript unnecessary Date of Service: 09/01/2015 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Simon; Attorney for Appellee: Lloyd [15-50779] (Kell Asher Simon ) [Entered: 09/01/2015 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 09/15/2015 for Appellant Derrick Dillard [15-50779] (MAS) [Entered: 08/31/2015 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick Dillard [15-50779] (MAS) [Entered: 08/21/2015 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Derrick Dillard v. City of Austin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Derrick Dillard | |
| Represented By: | Kell Asher Simon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: City of Austin, Texas | |
| Represented By: | Megan Mosby |
| Represented By: | Andralee Cain Lloyd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
