Lisa Chamberlin v. Marshall Fisher, Commissioner
Petitioner - Appellee: LISA JO CHAMBERLIN
Respondent - Appellant: MARSHALL L. FISHER, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 15-70012
Filed: April 23, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 27, 2017 Summary Chamberlin v. Fisher, Commissioner
July 10, 2017 Summary Lisa Chamberlin v. Marshall Fisher, Commissioner
March 20, 2018 Summary Chamberlin v. Fisher

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lisa Chamberlin v. Marshall Fisher, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellee: LISA JO CHAMBERLIN
Represented By: Elizabeth Unger Carlyle
Represented By: Alicia Kate Margolis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellant: MARSHALL L. FISHER, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Cameron Leigh Benton
Represented By: Marvin Luther White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?