Golden Nugget Lake Charles LLC v. W. G. Yates & Sons Const Co.
| GOLDEN NUGGET LAKE CHARLES, L.L.C., formerly known as Ameristar Casino Lake Charles, L.L.C., formerly known as Creative Casions of Louisiana, L.L.C. |
| W. G. YATES & SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY |
| 16-30496 |
| April 29, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Golden Nugget Lake Charles v. W. G. Yates & Son
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Golden Nugget Lake Charles LLC v. W. G. Yates & Sons Const Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: GOLDEN NUGGET LAKE CHARLES, L.L.C., formerly known as Ameristar Casino Lake Charles, L.L.C., formerly known as Creative Casions of Louisiana, L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Mark Wayne Frilot |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: W. G. YATES & SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Caruso |
| Represented By: | William Boyce Monk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
