Diana Acosta v. LeMans Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: Diana Acosta, Individually on Behalf of the Estate of Brian Barrera, Deceased, as Next Friend of B.M.B. and B.A.B, Minor Children, Edward Barrera, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Brian Barrera, Deceased and Charity Maples, As Next Friend of K.M., Minor Child and all Beneficiaries Entitled to Recover Under the Texas Wrongful Death Act for the Death of Brian Barrera, Deceased
Defendant / Appellee: Van Leeuwen Enterprises, Incorporated
Case Number: 16-41371
Filed: October 4, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: P.I. - Product Liability
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2017 Filing 15 COURT ORDER dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction (IN DETAIL) [15]. Judge: WED , Judge: JES , Judge: SAH [16-41371] (ABT) [Entered: 01/18/2017 01:49 PM]
November 7, 2016 Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Ruth Greenfield Malinas for party(s) Appellee Van Leeuwen Enterprises, Incorporated, in case 16-41371 [16-41371] (DMS) [Entered: 11/07/2016 07:37 AM]
November 3, 2016 Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes.. THE IMAGE FOR THIS FILING WILL NOT BE VIEWABLE AS IT CONTAINS SENSITIVE INFORMATION. [16-41371] (Ruth Malinas ) [Entered: 11/03/2016 02:02 PM]
October 12, 2016 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [16-41371] (SRF) [Entered: 10/12/2016 01:53 PM]
October 4, 2016 Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Diana Acosta, Mr. Edward Barrera and Ms. Charity Maples [16-41371] (LCA) [Entered: 10/04/2016 10:02 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Diana Acosta v. LeMans Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Diana Acosta, Individually on Behalf of the Estate of Brian Barrera, Deceased, as Next Friend of B.M.B. and B.A.B, Minor Children
Represented By: David Tarrant Bright Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Edward Barrera, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Brian Barrera, Deceased
Represented By: David Tarrant Bright Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Charity Maples, As Next Friend of K.M., Minor Child and all Beneficiaries Entitled to Recover Under the Texas Wrongful Death Act for the Death of Brian Barrera, Deceased
Represented By: David Tarrant Bright Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Van Leeuwen Enterprises, Incorporated
Represented By: Ruth Malinas Esq.
Represented By: Jaime A. Saenz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?