White Oak Realty, L.L.C., et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: WHITE OAK REALTY, L.L.C. and CITRUS REALTY, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS P. BOSTICK, Lieutenant General, United States Army Chief of Engineers, in his official capacity, JOHN W. PEABODY, Major General, Commander, Mississippi Valley Division, United States Army Corps of Engineers, in his official capacity and RICHARD L. HANSEN, Colonel, Commander, New Orleans District, United States Army Corps of Engineers, in his official capacity
Case Number: 17-30438
Filed: May 25, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 11, 2018 White Oak Realty, L.L.C., et al v. U.S. Army Corps

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: White Oak Realty, L.L.C., et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: WHITE OAK REALTY, L.L.C.
Represented By: Elizabeth L. Troutman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: CITRUS REALTY, L.L.C.
Represented By: Elizabeth L. Troutman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Represented By: Krystalyn Kinsel
Represented By: Katharine Paige O'Hale
Represented By: William J. Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: THOMAS P. BOSTICK, Lieutenant General, United States Army Chief of Engineers, in his official capacity
Represented By: Krystalyn Kinsel
Represented By: Katharine Paige O'Hale
Represented By: William J. Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: JOHN W. PEABODY, Major General, Commander, Mississippi Valley Division, United States Army Corps of Engineers, in his official capacity
Represented By: Krystalyn Kinsel
Represented By: Katharine Paige O'Hale
Represented By: William J. Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: RICHARD L. HANSEN, Colonel, Commander, New Orleans District, United States Army Corps of Engineers, in his official capacity
Represented By: Krystalyn Kinsel
Represented By: Katharine Paige O'Hale
Represented By: William J. Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?