Roberto Villarreal v. First Presidio Bank
| ROBERTO M. VILLARREAL |
| FIRST PRESIDIO BANK, and its Successor-in-Interest, Big Bend Banks, National Association, doing business as Marfa National Bank |
| 17-50765 |
| September 5, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Negotiable instruments |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Roberto Villarreal v. First Presidio Bank |
| Roberto Villarreal v. First Presidio Bank |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
504576198
REVISED UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [8837062-2] [17-50765]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Roberto Villarreal v. First Presidio Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: ROBERTO M. VILLARREAL | |
| Represented By: | William Abraham Elias |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: FIRST PRESIDIO BANK, and its Successor-in-Interest, Big Bend Banks, National Association, doing business as Marfa National Bank | |
| Represented By: | Mark C. Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
