USA v. Carlos Sauzo
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CARLOS SAUZO, also known as Felix Manuel Negron, also known as Miguel Rivera, also known as Felix Antonio Negron, Jr., also known as Carlos Emilio Saurzo-Martinez, also known as Carlos Suaso-Martinez, also known as Miguel Antonio Rivera
Case Number: 17-51114
Filed: December 14, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Vacate Sentence (2255)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 25, 2019 USA v. Carlos Sauzo

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Carlos Sauzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Joseph H. Gay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: CARLOS SAUZO, also known as Felix Manuel Negron, also known as Miguel Rivera, also known as Felix Antonio Negron, Jr., also known as Carlos Emilio Saurzo-Martinez, also known as Carlos Suaso-Martinez, also known as Miguel Antonio Rivera
Represented By: Carlos Sauzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?