Ivan Vetcher v. Dusty Rowden, et al
| ICE AGENTS, LNU/FNU, ICEA1, FNU HERNANDEZ, Detention Officer at Rolling Plains Regional Jail Detention Center, MARCELLO VILLEGAS, Warden, Rolling Plains Regional Jail Detention Center, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Supervisors, JEH C. JOHNSON, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Supervisors, FNU ASHLEY, Detention Officer at Rolling Plains Regional Jail Detention Center, DUSTY ROWDEN, ICE Deportation Officer, FNU ROSS, Detention Officer at Rolling Plains Regional Jail Detention Center, PHILIP T. MILLER, Assistant Director of Field Operations for Enforcement and Removal Operations, ICE AGENTS, LNU/FNU, ICEA2, ROLLING PLAINS REGIONAL JAIL & DETENTION CENTER STAFF and ICE OFFICERS, LNU/FNU |
| IVAN VETCHER |
| 19-10156 |
| February 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Vetcher v. Img and Customs Enforcement, et al |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER denying Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Ivan Vetcher [ # 9021308-2 ] [19-10156] (MFY) [Entered: 04/04/2019 09:26 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ivan Vetcher for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [9021308-2]. [19-10156] (MFY) [Entered: 04/03/2019 04:07 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-10156] (DDL) [Entered: 03/14/2019 03:46 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 02/22/2019 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Ivan Vetcher. [19-10156] (DLM) [Entered: 03/12/2019 03:40 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 04/22/2019 for Appellant Ivan Vetcher. [19-10156] (DLM) [Entered: 03/12/2019 03:46 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 1:16-CV-164. Electronic ROA due on 03/27/2019. [19-10156] (DLM) [Entered: 03/12/2019 03:50 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Ann Elizabeth Cruce-Haag for Appellee DHS in 19-10156, Attorney Ann Elizabeth Cruce-Haag for Appellee Dusty Rowden in 19-10156, Attorney Ann Elizabeth Cruce-Haag for Appellee Immigration and Customs Enforcement in 19-10156 [19-10156] (RSM) [Entered: 02/26/2019 11:02 AM] |
| FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Ivan Vetcher to the District Court for filing.Fee deadline canceled. [19-10156] (MRW) [Entered: 03/08/2019 12:58 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Ann Elizabeth Cruce-Haag for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Mr. Dusty Rowden and DHS for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-10156] (Ann Elizabeth Cruce-Haag ) [Entered: 02/21/2019 10:38 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER denying Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Ivan Vetcher [ # 8984481-2 ] [19-10156] (MRW) [Entered: 02/15/2019 09:15 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [8983471-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-10156] (DLM) [Entered: 02/13/2019 01:51 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 02/05/2019 allowing 20 days from the date of this order for appellant to pay the $505.00 filing fee or file a signed application to proceed IFP with the clerk. Fee deadline updated to 02/25/2019 for Appellant Ivan Vetcher [19-10156] (DLM) [Entered: 02/13/2019 01:55 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ivan Vetcher for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [8984481-2]. [19-10156] (MRW) [Entered: 02/14/2019 02:05 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ivan Vetcher [19-10156] (RSM) [Entered: 02/08/2019 10:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
