Richard Boyd v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit
DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT (DART) |
RICHARD SHELTON BOYD |
19-10212 |
February 20, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
COURT ORDER granting jurisdictional review to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [8999435-2]. [19-10212] (RAJ) [Entered: 03/12/2019 09:01 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-10212] (RAJ) [Entered: 03/07/2019 02:27 PM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Richard Shelton Boyd [19-10212] (CMB) [Entered: 02/20/2019 04:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Richard Boyd v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT (DART) | |
Represented By: | Joycell Marie Hollins Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: RICHARD SHELTON BOYD | |
Represented By: | Richard Shelton Boyd |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.