Kathy Dyer, et al v. City of Mesquite Texas, et al
| ROBERT DYER, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Graham Dyer and KATHY DYER |
| RICHARD HOUSTON, JOE BAKER, PAUL POLISH, WILLIAM HEIDELBURG, ALAN GAFFORD and ZACHARY SCOTT |
| 19-10280 |
| March 11, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Dyer v. Houston
|
|
Dyer v. City of Mesquite
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Joe C. Tooley for Appellee Joe Baker in 19-10280, Attorney Joe C. Tooley for Appellee Paul Polish in 19-10280, Attorney Joe C. Tooley for Appellee William Heidelburg in 19-10280, Attorney Joe C. Tooley for Appellee Zachary Scott in 19-10280, Attorney Joe C. Tooley for Appellee Alan Gafford in 19-10280, Attorney Joe C. Tooley for Appellee Richard Houston in 19-10280 [19-10280] (RSM) [Entered: 04/24/2019 12:36 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Joe C. Tooley, Esq. for Mr. Joe Baker, Mr. Alan Gafford, Mr. William Heidelburg, Mr. Richard Houston, Mr. Paul Polish and Mr. Zachary Scott for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-10280] (Joe C. Tooley ) [Entered: 04/23/2019 11:14 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-10280] (CB) [Entered: 04/23/2019 02:27 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/03/2019 for Appellants Kathy Dyer and Robert Dyer. [19-10280] (CB) [Entered: 04/23/2019 02:27 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the appearance form received from Attorney Joe C. Tooley for Appellees Mr. Joe Baker, Mr. Alan Gafford, Mr. William Heidelburg, Mr. Richard Houston, Mr. Paul Polish and Mr. Zachary Scott because improperly submitted as a petition for review [19-10280] (SDH) [Entered: 04/12/2019 12:46 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 3:15-CV-2638. Electronic ROA due on 04/24/2019. [19-10280] (SDH) [Entered: 04/09/2019 03:37 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Ms. Kathy Dyer and Mr. Robert Dyer advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [19-10280] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Ms. Kathy Dyer and Mr. Robert Dyer advising transcript unnecessary Date of Service: 04/09/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Hudson, Hutchison; Attorney for Appellee: Tooley [19-10280] (Susan E. Hutchison ) [Entered: 04/09/2019 02:38 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) James Robert Hudson for party(s) Appellant Kathy Dyer Appellant Robert Dyer, in case 19-10280 [19-10280] (AGL) [Entered: 04/02/2019 09:37 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Susan E. Hutchison for Appellant Robert Dyer in 19-10280, Attorney Susan E. Hutchison for Appellant Kathy Dyer in 19-10280 [19-10280] (AGL) [Entered: 04/02/2019 09:36 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mrs. Susan E. Hutchison for Ms. Kathy Dyer and Mr. Robert Dyer for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-10280] (Susan E. Hutchison ) [Entered: 03/29/2019 03:14 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-10280] (James Robert Hudson ) [Entered: 03/29/2019 03:19 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9005849-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 04/01/2019 for Appellants Kathy Dyer and Robert Dyer [19-10280] (RLL) [Entered: 03/15/2019 09:19 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Kathy Dyer and Mr. Robert Dyer [19-10280] (RSM) [Entered: 03/11/2019 02:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
