Mitchell Wagner v. TDCJ, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: MITCHELL WAGNER
Defendant / Appellee: CLAYTON WHEEDEN, JAMES FINLEY, ARCHIE D. SCARBOROUGH, RICHARD BURGESS, TEXAS KAIROS ORGANIZATION, KEITH F. MEEKS and STANLEY J. BALDWIN
Case Number: 19-10298
Filed: March 13, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2019 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Mechelle Daniel, Est. Completion Dt: 05/30/2019, Est. No.of Pgs: 65, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 04/30/2019, Dt. Trans. to be Filed: 05/30/2019, Proceeding Type and Date: Evidentiary Hearing 05/16/2017. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 05/30/2019 for Mechelle Daniel, Court Reporter [19-10298] (AGL) [Entered: 05/01/2019 01:49 PM]
May 1, 2019 COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Court Reporter Ms. Mechelle Daniel. [19-10298] (Mechelle Daniel ) [Entered: 05/01/2019 11:42 AM]
April 30, 2019 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Mitchell Wagner. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Mechelle Daniel, Proceeding Type and Date: Evidentiary Hearing 05/16/2017. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 05/10/2019 for Mechelle Daniel, Court Reporter. [19-10298] (MVM) [Entered: 04/30/2019 03:09 PM]
April 26, 2019 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion for transcript at government expense received from Appellant Mr. Mitchell Wagner because it is unnecessary, The request was granted in district court on April 18, 2019 [19-10298] (CNF) [Entered: 04/29/2019 03:15 PM]
April 24, 2019 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [19-10298] (MVM) [Entered: 04/24/2019 11:02 AM]
April 24, 2019 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/18/2019 - Before the Court is Appellant's Motion Requesting Transcript at Government Expense. The Court finds that Appellant's motion should be GRANTED, provided that Appellant returns the completed transcript request form according to the instructions provided on the form and by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Transcript order due on 05/09/2019 for Appellant Mitchell Wagner [19-10298] (MVM) [Entered: 04/24/2019 11:02 AM]
April 8, 2019 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 03/26/2019 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Mr. Mitchell Wagner. Initial partial filing fee assessed. [19-10298] (CB) [Entered: 04/08/2019 07:58 AM]
April 8, 2019 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [19-10298] (CB) [Entered: 04/08/2019 08:06 AM]
April 5, 2019 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Mitchell Wagner to appoint counsel [9023312-2]. Date of service: 03/30/2019 [19-10298] (CNF) [Entered: 04/05/2019 02:39 PM]
March 20, 2019 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9009005-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. (IFP Pending in DC). [19-10298] (CMB) [Entered: 03/20/2019 09:22 AM]
March 13, 2019 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Mitchell Wagner [19-10298] (RSM) [Entered: 03/13/2019 11:36 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mitchell Wagner v. TDCJ, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MITCHELL WAGNER
Represented By: Mitchell Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CLAYTON WHEEDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JAMES FINLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ARCHIE D. SCARBOROUGH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RICHARD BURGESS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TEXAS KAIROS ORGANIZATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KEITH F. MEEKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STANLEY J. BALDWIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?