Gordon Lewis v. Lorie Davis, Director
| GORDON RAY LEWIS |
| LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION |
| 19-10303 |
| March 15, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to comply with COA requirements filed by Appellant Mr. Gordon Ray Lewis [ # 9046454-2 ] Motion due deadline updated to 06/27/2019 for Appellant Gordon Ray Lewis. Brief in Support deadline updated to 06/27/2019 for Appellant Gordon Ray Lewis [19-10303] (CNF) [Entered: 05/07/2019 09:18 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Gordon Ray Lewis to extend time to comply with COA requirements [9046454-2]. Date of service: 04/30/2019 [19-10303] (CNF) [Entered: 05/07/2019 09:17 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-10303] (CAG) [Entered: 05/03/2019 02:29 PM] |
| LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 05/28/2019 for Appellant Gordon Ray Lewis. Brief in Support due on 05/28/2019 for Appellant Gordon Ray Lewis [19-10303] (MVM) [Entered: 04/15/2019 08:00 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/08/2019 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Gordon Ray Lewis.Fee deadline satisfied [19-10303] (MVM) [Entered: 04/15/2019 07:59 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:17-CV-1025. Electronic ROA due on 04/30/2019. [19-10303] (MVM) [Entered: 04/15/2019 08:33 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-10303] (Gretchen Berumen Merenda ) [Entered: 04/09/2019 07:50 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Gretchen Berumen Merenda for party(s) Appellee Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 19-10303 [19-10303] (SDH) [Entered: 04/09/2019 02:05 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process for both appeals. [9013098-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 04/09/2019 for Appellant Gordon Ray Lewis [19-10303] (SDH) [Entered: 03/25/2019 01:27 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9008570-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Gordon Ray Lewis. [9008570-1] [19-10303] (MFY) [Entered: 03/19/2019 02:28 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Gordon Ray Lewis [19-10303] (MFY) [Entered: 03/19/2019 02:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gordon Lewis v. Lorie Davis, Director | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: GORDON RAY LEWIS | |
| Represented By: | Gordon Ray Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION | |
| Represented By: | Charles Davus Arnone |
| Represented By: | Gretchen Berumen Merenda Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
