Lynn-Wayne Wooley v. Lori Covington, et al
| BENJAMIN W. COVINGTON, LORI JEANNE COVINGTON and DAVID TERRELL KULESZ, individually and Attorney Bond #11761800 |
| LYNN-WAYNE WOOLEY |
| 19-10337 |
| March 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-10337] (CB) [Entered: 05/07/2019 02:13 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/17/2019 for Appellant Lynn-Wayne Wooley. [19-10337] (CB) [Entered: 05/07/2019 02:13 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:19-CV-238. Electronic ROA due on 05/17/2019. [19-10337] (MBC) [Entered: 05/02/2019 03:35 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/17/2019 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Lynn-Wayne Wooley. [19-10337] (MBC) [Entered: 05/02/2019 03:30 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Lynn-Wayne Wooley. [19-10337] (MBC) [Entered: 05/02/2019 03:29 PM] |
| FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Lynn-Wayne Wooley to the District Court for filing.Fee deadline canceled. [19-10337] (MBC) [Entered: 04/16/2019 12:23 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9018740-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 04/16/2019 for Appellant Lynn-Wayne Wooley [19-10337] (LLL) [Entered: 04/01/2019 02:34 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Lynn-Wayne Wooley [19-10337] (LLL) [Entered: 03/26/2019 09:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
