USA v. Scott Hall
| SCOTT RILEY HALL |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-10352 |
| April 1, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE RECEIVED that the transcript ordered by Appellant Mr. Scott Riley Hall is complete and has been filed in the District Court. [19-10352] (Mechelle Daniel ) [Entered: 05/16/2019 08:48 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Mechelle Daniel, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 05/16/2019 Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date canceled [19-10352] (SDH) [Entered: 05/16/2019 10:38 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 5:18-CR-98-1. Electronic ROA due on 05/31/2019. [19-10352] (SDH) [Entered: 05/16/2019 10:39 AM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Scott Riley Hallfor the Court to process. Date of service: 04/25/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Hendrix; Attorney for Appellant: Hurley. [19-10352] (Daniel W. Hurley ) [Entered: 04/25/2019 09:53 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Scott Riley Hall. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Mechelle Daniel, Proceeding Type and Date: Rearraignment 11/26/2018. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 05/06/2019 for Mechelle Daniel, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 9037087-2 ] [19-10352] (MVM) [Entered: 04/25/2019 02:47 PM] |
| COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Court Reporter Ms. Mechelle Daniel. [19-10352] (Mechelle Daniel ) [Entered: 04/25/2019 03:10 PM] |
| ACKNOWLEDGMENT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Mechelle Daniel, Est. Completion Dt: 05/27/2019, Est. No.of Pgs: 25, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 04/25/2019, Proceeding Type and Date: Rearraignment 11/26/2018. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 05/28/2019 for Mechelle Daniel, Court Reporter [19-10352] (RAJ) [Entered: 04/25/2019 04:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Daniel W. Hurley for Appellant Scott Riley Hall in 19-10352 [19-10352] (RLL) [Entered: 04/23/2019 02:33 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-10352] (Daniel W. Hurley ) [Entered: 04/22/2019 10:04 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9020538-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 04/18/2019 for Appellant Scott Riley Hall [19-10352] (CSG) [Entered: 04/03/2019 09:30 AM] |
| NON-DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Scott Riley Hall [19-10352] (CSG) [Entered: 04/01/2019 12:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Scott Hall | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: SCOTT RILEY HALL | |
| Represented By: | Daniel W. Hurley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | James Wesley Hendrix |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
