Christopher Wooten v. Stan Parker, et al
| FNU GREEN, Judge, Howard County, FNU AVERETT, Howard County Deputy Sheriff, STAN PARKER, Howard County Sheriff, TIMOTHY GREEN, Magistrate, Howard County, COLLEEN BARTON, Howard County District Clerk, ROBERT H. MOORE, III, Judge, FNU BUCHANAN, Howard County Deputy Sheriff and TIMOTHY D. YEATS, Howard County Judge, 118th District |
| CHRISTOPHER WOOTEN |
| 19-10573 |
| May 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Christopher Wooten v. Stan Parker, et al |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Christopher Wooten to appoint counsel [9091856-2]. [19-10573] (CNF) [Entered: 07/08/2019 08:51 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9067729-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-10573] (CBW) [Entered: 06/04/2019 01:23 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9062307-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Christopher Wooten. [9062307-1] [19-10573] (CBW) [Entered: 05/28/2019 02:54 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9060827-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 07/18/2019 for Appellant Christopher Wooten [19-10573] (WMJ) [Entered: 05/24/2019 11:41 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Christopher Wooten [19-10573] (WMJ) [Entered: 05/20/2019 02:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
