Roberto Martinez v. David Presley
ROBERTO MARTINEZ |
FNU KAISER |
19-10583 |
May 22, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [9083853-2] [19-10583] (MVM) [Entered: 06/25/2019 02:44 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9064731-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 06/17/2019 for Appellant Roberto Martinez [19-10583] (WMJ) [Entered: 05/31/2019 09:14 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Roberto Martinez [19-10583] (WMJ) [Entered: 05/22/2019 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Roberto Martinez v. David Presley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: ROBERTO MARTINEZ | |
Represented By: | Roberto Martinez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: FNU KAISER | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.