Tracy Nixon v. Mary Brown, et al
| KEN PAXTON, The Attorney General of the State of Texas, KIMBERLYN RHYNES and MARY BROWN, Judge |
| TRACY SHON NIXON |
| 19-10898 |
| August 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the affidavit of financial status received from Appellant Mr. Tracy Shon Nixon because a proper motion to proceed in forma pauperis is needed [19-10898] (MVM) [Entered: 09/26/2019 11:39 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 08/29/2019 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Tracy Shon Nixon. Fee due on 10/15/2019 for Appellant Tracy Shon Nixon [19-10898] (MVM) [Entered: 09/13/2019 11:26 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Tracy Shon Nixon. [19-10898] (CB) [Entered: 08/28/2019 08:10 AM] |
| UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [19-10898] (CB) [Entered: 08/28/2019 08:07 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 08/13/2019 denying motion for new trial [19-10898] (CB) [Entered: 08/28/2019 08:07 AM] |
| FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Tracy Shon Nixon to the District Court for filing. [19-10898] (PAC) [Entered: 08/13/2019 03:25 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for dc#14 motion for new trial.. [9119615-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [19-10898] (CCR) [Entered: 08/12/2019 04:01 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Tracy Shon Nixon [19-10898] (CCR) [Entered: 08/08/2019 12:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
