John Williams v. Lorie Davis, Director
| JOHN WILLIAM WILLIAMS |
| LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION |
| 19-11042 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. Willis Chambers is designated as inactive in this case. Reason:he is no longer with AG's Office. [19-11042] (AS) [Entered: 10/23/2019 11:34 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-11042] (DDL) [Entered: 10/18/2019 07:47 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/09/2019 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. John William Williams. [19-11042] (LEF) [Entered: 10/10/2019 03:15 PM] |
| LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 11/19/2019 for Appellant John William Williams. Brief in Support due on 11/19/2019 for Appellant John William Williams [19-11042] (LEF) [Entered: 10/10/2019 03:15 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:18-CV-964. Electronic ROA due on 10/25/2019. [19-11042] (LEF) [Entered: 10/10/2019 03:23 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. John William Williams. Fee deadline satisfied. [19-11042] (CNF) [Entered: 10/09/2019 08:14 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Gretchen Berumen Merenda for party(s) Appellee Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 19-11042 [19-11042] (LEF) [Entered: 09/26/2019 04:35 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9153602-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 10/11/2019 for Appellant John William Williams [19-11042] (LEF) [Entered: 09/26/2019 10:30 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-11042] (Rachel Leigh Patton ) [Entered: 09/26/2019 12:07 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-11042] (Gretchen Berumen Merenda ) [Entered: 09/26/2019 12:21 PM] |
| Attorney Gretchen Merenda is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: The submitted appearance form does not match the registered attorney. [19-11042] (LBM) [Entered: 09/26/2019 02:12 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. John William Williams [19-11042] (MBC) [Entered: 09/19/2019 02:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: John Williams v. Lorie Davis, Director | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: JOHN WILLIAM WILLIAMS | |
| Represented By: | John William Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION | |
| Represented By: | Willis B. H. Chambers |
| Represented By: | Gretchen Berumen Merenda Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
