USA v. Pedro Suares
PEDRO ROLLERO SUARES, also known as Pedro Rollero-Suares |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION |
19-11288 |
November 29, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE CAPTION updated. Appellee Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division added to case. Reason: should have been added at case opening., Involvement terminated for Appellee USA in 19-11288. Reason: not a party in the case., Party information modified for Pedro Rollero Suares in 19-11288. [19-11288] (RSM) [Entered: 01/13/2020 11:00 AM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Pedro Rollero Suares for certificate of appealability [9226346-2]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [19-11288] (CNF) [Entered: 01/09/2020 12:01 PM] |
BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Pedro Rollero Suares in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9226346-2 ] Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [9226347-1] [19-11288] (CNF) [Entered: 01/09/2020 12:02 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-11288] (DDL) [Entered: 12/20/2019 03:48 PM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the notice of application received from Appellant Mr. Pedro Rollero Suares because this is a copy of the document which was filed with district court on 11/26/19 [19-11288] (CNF) [Entered: 01/09/2020 11:55 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9202488-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Motion due on 01/13/2020 for Appellant Pedro Rollero Suares. Brief in Support due on 01/13/2020 for Appellant Pedro Rollero Suares [19-11288] (WMJ) [Entered: 12/04/2019 09:36 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 3:19-CV-2032. Electronic ROA due on 12/19/2019. [19-11288] (WMJ) [Entered: 12/04/2019 09:47 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Pedro Rollero Suares [19-11288] (RSM) [Entered: 11/29/2019 09:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Pedro Suares | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: PEDRO ROLLERO SUARES, also known as Pedro Rollero-Suares | |
Represented By: | Pedro Rollero Suares |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Leigha Amy Simonton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.