Karen Robinson v. U.S. Bank, N.A., et al
| OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, L.L.C. and U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee, successor in interest to Bank of America NA as Trustee, successor by merger to LaSalle Bank NA, as Trustee for SACO I Trust 2005-WM3 Mortgage Backed Certificates, Series 2005-WM3 |
| KAREN ARMELIN ROBINSON |
| 19-11315 |
| December 11, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Adam Ross Nunnallee for party(s) Appellee U.S. Bank, N.A. Appellee Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C., in case 19-11315 [19-11315] (CAS) [Entered: 01/09/2020 10:16 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-11315] (Adam Ross Nunnallee ) [Entered: 01/08/2020 09:51 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Barry A. McCain for Appellee Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C. in 19-11315, Attorney Barry A. McCain for Appellee U.S. Bank, N.A. in 19-11315 [19-11315] (CAS) [Entered: 01/07/2020 05:21 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Barry A. McCain for Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C. and U.S. Bank, N.A. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-11315] (Barry A. McCain ) [Entered: 01/07/2020 03:29 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 02/18/2020 for Appellant Karen Armelin Robinson. [19-11315] (DDL) [Entered: 01/07/2020 08:30 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-11315] (DDL) [Entered: 01/07/2020 08:30 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9214741-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-11315] (MVM) [Entered: 12/19/2019 03:18 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 3:19-CV-101. Electronic ROA due on 01/03/2020. [19-11315] (MVM) [Entered: 12/19/2019 03:20 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Karen Armelin Robinson [19-11315] (LEF) [Entered: 12/11/2019 09:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Karen Robinson v. U.S. Bank, N.A., et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Barry A. McCain |
| Represented By: | Adam Ross Nunnallee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee, successor in interest to Bank of America NA as Trustee, successor by merger to LaSalle Bank NA, as Trustee for SACO I Trust 2005-WM3 Mortgage Backed Certificates, Series 2005-WM3 | |
| Represented By: | Barry A. McCain |
| Represented By: | Adam Ross Nunnallee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: KAREN ARMELIN ROBINSON | |
| Represented By: | Michael Brinkley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
